Thursday, August 07, 2008  | 
 
 
 

Creative Writing

Poetry, Think-Pieces, Humor

The Regulars

iphone Offers Americans the Perfect Way to Relate to a Hurting World

by Erin Dunigan
 
I've changed my mind. Call me a flip-flopper if you will, but I'm not ashamed to admit that I've had a change of heart when it comes to my feelings about the recent consumer frenzy regarding the coveted iPhone.
You see, I have been conflicted about jumping on the bandwagon, not because of the iPhone itself, but because I'm not a fan of bandwagons.  Call me a rebel if you will (though if you knew me this thought would make you chuckle), when something becomes what you must have or do or be, then I'm out. No thanks. I'm just not interested anymore. Sure, I want to be 'cool' (I'll refrain from using a more bandwagon term) like anyone else, but somehow the resister just takes over and, well, too bad.
I've located my iPhone resistance as lodged in the part of me that feels like there is just something wrong with a world in which those who have the means eagerly devour the perfect new gadget and all of its required accessories (adapter, case, Bluetooth, headphones…) while much of the world hopes for food enough for today.
I was wrong.  I can admit that. Because today I saw the light.
Instead of being an example of the distance between the 'haves' and the 'have nots' of the world, the iPhone is actually the perfect way for those 'haves' to begin to relate to the 'have nots' around the world.
Allow me to explain. Today was the day I had picked to take the plunge and join the bandwagon, in spite of my reservations, because I've just been too won over to the device itself, and yes, if I must admit, I'm probably a sucker for the marketing just like everyone else.
Knowing that the Apple Store opens at 10AM, I figured I'd get there early, to get a spot in line.  Knowing that iPhones are in limited supply, with lots of demand, this seemed like a good plan of action.  But also not wanting to get there too early, and look like one of those fanatics who camps out for something as silly as an iPhone, I decided that 9:30 was the perfect arrival time.
I walked up to the store confident. I got in line. It wasn't too long, actually. Some people looked at me. I asked the guy in front of me if he knew for sure that there were phones. "Actually, they just said I'm the last person in line," he replied. What?! I missed it by one person?  Had I been only a few minutes earlier, I could have been one of the lucky ones? But now, just because of the cruelty of fate, I was one person too late? That just doesn't seem fair. Why aren't there enough for everyone? Why do I have to go hungry?
That, of course, was when it hit me.  I realized. The iPhone is the perfect way to help those of us who suffer little in the world to understand the plight of those who suffer much.

Can't relate to the recent riots over food shortages?

Think disgruntled customers crashing Apple's servers on iPhone release day.

Can't understand the outrage at having to pay more for the basic necessities in life?

Imagine all those existing AT&T customers who have to pay $399 for what is an $199 iPhone for everyone else.

Don't relate to the growing crisis over insufficient supplies of fresh water?

Imagine that you are me and you got to the Apple Store just one person too late, having to go home empty handed.

Don't understand why the increase in globalization is causing some in the developing world to resent those in the developed one?

Think about how you feel as you return to your car empty-handed while someone on your right walks past smugly cradling his new phone.


Now, perhaps, instead of using the tired old line, "think about the people starving in China," all we have to do to relate to the suffering of the world is to remind ourselves, "think about all you went through to get your iPhone."

To be eco-friendly, do you have to be smelly?

by Erin Dunigan


Last week it cost me $85 to fill up my gas tank. No lie. At my typical one tank a week, that’s putting me just about $350 a month for gas. Being rather under-employed (which is different, of course, than un-employed, mainly in the fact that being underemployed does not allow the possibility of collecting a governmental check, but that’s beside the point) this is quite a large monthly sum. That fact has helped to nudge me further in the direction of my already pre-disposed environmental tendencies.  

Take today, for instance. I had an all day meeting in a location just two miles from my house. At about a fifteen-minute mile, that’s a half-hour walk.  If I am going to ‘go for a walk’ as a form of exercise, I usually do so for anywhere from thirty minutes to an hour. So, a thirty-minute walk is perfect. Thirty minutes there, all day sitting in a meeting, thirty minutes home. Plus, that means when I get home, I don’t have to then ‘exercise’ because I’ve already walked four miles. How could it be more perfect, really?

Well, there was one slight downside. I need to have my laptop for the meeting. No big deal, I’ll just throw it in a backpack and I’m good to go. Well, the laptop, the cord, cell phone, wallet…not that many items, but the weight did seem to somehow add up. No big deal, two miles isn’t that far. It’s not like I’m going backpacking or something.

Another slight problem. Though I did not have to be dressed formally for the meeting, I tend to live in flip-flops.  But living in them and walking two miles contiguously in them are two different things. No big deal, I can throw the flip-flops in the backpack, and change out of the running shoes when I get to the meeting. My feet would absolutely revolt if they had to remain in the running shoes all day, as would my slightly vain side.

But then came the kicker.  Though I don’t live in the mountains, this particular two-mile walk is a bit, well, a bit hilly. Not too hilly for me to be able to make it, but, what I found out, too hilly for me to be able to make it sweat-free. I don’t mind sweating if I’m working out—it’s to be expected, right? But sweating in your normal clothes, when you are on your way to an all day meeting is another thing entirely.

I began to wonder, do you have to be smelly to be eco-friendly? I had a friend who warned me about the evils of standard deodorant and urged me to try the ‘organic’ type. I did, much to the dismay of those around me. It’s not that I’m an overly smelly or sweaty person, but it just doesn’t work. Sure, it might be better for you (and I’d rather not get cancer from deodorant) but the problem is, it doesn’t work. If I’m going to smell, I might as well not wear anything and save the deodorant money to put toward gas. The same thing with walking instead of driving. Or riding a bike. Either way, you get to your destination a little less put together and a little more, well, exerted.

Do I really have to choose?

Is it the environment or my own social acceptability?

I’d love to think I’d do the right thing, but truth be told, after today’s little adventure, I’m not so sure. I love the idea of being eco-friendly. I love the idea of saving money on gas when I could just as easily walk. I love having that extra time to think and to process and to get caught up on phone calls now that it is illegal to talk and drive in California without being hands free.

The problem is, I think I like ‘not smelling’ just a little bit more.
 

 

A Bite of the Apple

by Erin Dunigan

I’ve been contemplating getting an iPhone for a few months now. I didn’t get one the last time around because, well, because of the price, which seemed a bit excessive, but I guess more than that was probably my general resistance to the madness. But having taken advantage of my friends with iPhones long enough—for directions (“hey, I’m on the road, can you find me the closest Starbucks?”) or for traffic reports (“hey, can you tell me what’s up with the 405?”)—I realized that I was ready to take the plunge. I’m tired of saying things like, “I’ll email you when I get home to my computer” or “No, I didn’t get the email about _____ because I’ve been away from my computer all day.”

But even with these practical issues I have had to work hard to overcome the subtle but pervasive sense of resistance.  As the proud owner of a MacBookPro, I’m a big fan of things Apple, so it’s not an anti-Apple resistance. Plus, I’m usually a huge fan of group bonding moments such as waiting in line for UCLA basketball games or the launch of Windows 95 (I was paid to be a PC geek back then). So the idea of lining up at the Apple store to both purchase the new iPhone but also show my allegiance to the cause should have been compelling. 

The thing is, it wasn’t. 

I did finally decide at about 6PM on July 11(release date) to walk (it’s a two mile walk) over to the Apple store and see if there were any iPhones left.
Was the walking some manifestation of the resistance? I think so.  Somehow walking thwarted whatever inevitable force had been put in motion, so that at least I was drawn toward it more slowly.
A gradual and slightly sweaty thirty minutes later I arrived.  There, in the center of the mall, it stood.  The tree whose fruit was ripe and ready for the tasting. I saw that the line was still wrapped around the building. I slithered up to the front of the line and asked,

-“How long have you been waiting?”
-“About two hours.”

The reply was enthusiastic.  I stood for a moment and did the math, realizing two hours in line would put me past closing time. Was that relief that seemed to flood through my body as the temptation was, at least temporarily, averted?  “It can’t hurt just to go inside and look around,” I rationalized, clearly not interested in turning away from that which beckoned. But as I walked in the door the resistance surged. “What is up with that?” I wondered. “I’m planning on buying one. So what’s with the hesitancy?” I thought to myself while surveying chaos. I looked around at all of the people - there were a lot, the store was packed - happily plucking boxes off the shelves like fruit from the tree, signing away their lives in exchange for this coveted taste of a paradise which will grant to its owner knowledge beyond the old-fashioned limitations of good and evil. 

The emotion, I realized with surprise, was sadness. A strange companion at such a feast, no? But as I looked at row after row of headphones, car chargers, cases, and docking stations it was depression, not elation, which washed over me. 

Before I go any further I have to digress to share a story. Don’t worry, it relates. My entire life I have gone on mission trips, aka: trips to visit places that are less well off in the world (not a hard standard to meet, coming from Newport Beach, California) in order to spend time with people there and hopefully help them. These trips have easily been some of the best experiences of my life. However, each time, when I returned, I felt the need to either not buy new things, or give away my current things, in order to somehow purge the privilege from my life. So, one year, before taking one of these trips to Guatemala, I bought a set of golf clubs.  I figured that I would be too guilty to buy them after the trip, so I took care of it before I left. 

Back to the Apple Store. Standing there I realized that the wave of sadness was caused by the excessiveness of the consumption surrounding me. The excessiveness of the consumption combined with the undeniable knowledge that much of the world, some of them my friends, lives in such poverty that a situation like this would be unfathomable. I’m not trying to be holier than thou here. Keep in mind, I’m the one who premeditated the golf club purchase (clubs which I also have to admit that I’ve only used a handful of times in as many years). It’s also not that this divide doesn’t already exist in the world every day. It has nothing to do, particularly, with the iPhone. But the iPhone did provide a glaring and difficult to ignore illustration of the world’s inequity. I walked out of the store empty handed. I’m still planning on buying an iPhone. But I wonder about the implications of tasting that fruit.

Poor People Tired of Being “Lumped Together” with Oppressed People

by Kermit Pitsfield

VOXNEWS, Atlanta.

In a statement issued from Harare, Zimbabwe, IPISS president Hugo Boutyobidniz officially denied any link between poor people and oppressed people. In an irksome tone, he told reporters that he is “sick and tired of liberal do-gooders who want to help the poor and the oppressed.” He explained that “for years the International Peoples of Impoverished States and Societies has tolerated an idiomatic cliché that has lumped together two distinctly different groups. No more!”

When asked about poor people who also live under oppressive regimes, Boutyobidniz snapped, “Those wishy-washy ‘bi-partisans’ would do well to get off the fence and join a side!”

This statement comes on the heels of a statement released by carrier pigeon from the Centre for Underrepresented and Needy Tajiks. Among the issues addressed, the statement claimed that “oppression-free poor people are just annoying little whiners.” The pigeon was sent from Dushanbe, Tajikistan on October 12, 2001 and arrived at the G8 conference last week.

This reporter asked Mr. Boutyobidniz if his statement was a reaction to the one issued from Dushanbe. Boutyobidniz claimed not to have heard the comment until just then. He was then seen stamping his foot and crossing his arms while saying, “That’s just not fair!”

Mr. Boutyobidniz explained that he generally doesn’t get news like that due to lack of a radio, television and internet access. “I do have access to major news papers,” he said, “but I usually use them as blankets. Besides, I can’t read.”

“But I’m not blaming my lack of education on any dictator,” he continued. “That’s the sort of thing that ‘oppressed people’ might say!”

Nobody from the Centre for Underrepresented and Needy Tajiks was available for comment.  However, a smoke-signal was seen late yesterday afternoon by an Afghanistan affiliate, the Afghani Stewards of Socialism. According to the group’s smoke-signal translator, the signal invited Mr. Boutyobidniz to get reacquainted with his mother more intimately.

Boutyobidniz has been estranged from his mother ever since she became acting regent of Prostitutes Of Oppressed Peoples.  She now goes by her maiden name, Iva Caisuvteebee. Mrs. Caisuvteebee was unable to respond due to her attendance at an all night meeting with Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe.

An unnamed source told this reporter that President Mugabe and Mrs. Caisuvteebee were meeting to discuss appropriation for a new Zimbabwean political party called the Freedom for Underrepresented City Kids and The Harlots Estranged from People Of Oppressive Republics.

Mr. Boutyobidniz has neither supported nor denounced the formation of the new party. But he quipped, “That title is sure a mouthful! They had better think of an acronym for it.” AP

 

Plane Thoughts

by Stephen Ausburne

 

I don’t like to fly any more than I like to be a part of a time share presentation. At the close of the journey, you might say that the end justified the means, but during, all you want to do is go back home. In either case I feel like at any moment something could go horribly wrong. In one scenario, that would mean plummeting 30,000 feet to the hard earth in a fiery comet of hysterical death. In the other, I might inadvertently sign up for a ten year contract to some hillside gated community populated by retired insurance salesmen and members of the Witness Protection Program. Either way my future looks mighty bleak.

            I realize that plane crashes are not as common as car crashes. That said, I would like to know the ratio of car accidents that end in death vs. plane wrecks that end in death. I haven’t heard of too many fender benders in the sky. Maybe that’s not the appropriate terminology, perhaps they’re known as wing-dings. Regardless, if something goes amiss up here, this mother becomes a school bus, which is fine if cruising Main Street, but halfway to the moon, not so much.

            I’m not even sure that it’s the fear of dying that bothers me, but more so the thought of dying with these people. I’ve been fighting over an armrest with Captain Mouth Breather here and now I’ve got to be his personal escort into the eternal afterlife? Sure I’ve been secretly wishing for most of the passengers’ demise, but not like this. Not with me included in the deal. I’m different. I’m a good guy. I’d be missed. There’s still much for me to accomplish - not like these extras in the movie that is my life. Let them get dysentery, I’ve got an Oregon Trail to blaze.

            One thing I’d really like to do before I die is to go to Europe. Often I wonder why. Why go out of your way to be surrounded by people you can’t communicate with? I guess it’s beautiful but so are a lot of places within decent driving distance of my house. I never make the time to venture out to these places, so why pass them by to go to the “old country?” In reality I’m only assuming that Europe is beautiful based on pictures and testimonials from friends who have actually been there. Who can trust those sources? Perhaps the real attraction is that I could travel in a place where there is little to no chance of passing a Wal-Mart.

            I hate going to Wal-Mart. I loathe going to Wal-Mart. I’m pretty sure going into one is hazardous to my health. When I was growing up I used to claim that I was allergic to Miller’s Outpost in the mall to try and avoid going shopping with my mother and sister, but Wal-Mart is different. It isn’t just the having to watch for falling prices, it’s that I actually feel stupider upon entering the premises. I know the place is reasonably priced and convenient, but is it really worth it? I feel dirty and used just going through the checkout line. I guess it makes sense to do your one-stop shopping there, especially if your list looks something like:

 
Milk
Wine
Band-Aids
Prescription eye glasses
Teddy Grahams
Road House DVD
Bean Bag chair
Steel Toe Boots
Neon Tetras (3)
Syphilis
10 speed bike
 

I realize that you can’t actually purchase syphilis at Wal-Mart, but I’m sure that, while you’re there, you could get it if you really wanted it. All that said, I shop at Wal-Mart. Sometimes it’s just too cheap to pass up. One thing is for sure, I don’t go in to browse. I locate my item, find the shortest line, and get my tail out. I treat shopping at Wal-Mart like having to go back into a house that you just set a bug defogger off in: Hold your breath, run in, get your keys, and bail out like your life depends on it.

            Back to the matter at hand. When flying, oddly enough, I prefer the window seat. You would think that having the best view of the area where the search party will begin sifting through your remains would only add to the self induced trauma that I’ve kicked into high gear. Perhaps the vantage point is so spectacular that it is just surreal enough to distract me from myself. Or maybe the oxygen level is such by the window that the part of my brain that specializes in panic is being starved and slowly dying. Whatever it is, it works.

            The window seat does have its disadvantages though. The problem is that everyone wants to see out, especially the people in your row. You know, the one’s right next to you? I mean RIGHT next to you. I’m sitting there looking out over all of creation, drinking in its majesty, then once I’ve had my fill for a while, I slowly turn back and realize that my neighbor here is staring through my head like it's one of those coin-operated binoculars you find on the top of a skyscraper. Now I feel compelled to resume looking out to try and mitigate the awkwardness of our perpendicular sight line. But I don’t want to look anymore. I’m done. We’re over Wyoming for crap’s sake, this is officially the intermission of the flight across America. Good God man, it’s a beige tablecloth, go read your in-flight magazine! Now I’m smashed against the window to avoid peripheral eye contact from the lean in, who is now inches away from an actual moment of touch. If he gets any closer, I might as well have him in a backpack while he teaches me the ways of the force.

            The seat by the wing sort of ruins the whole window strategy. There’s no way to get caught up in the view and forget you’re on a plane when all you can see is the most fragile, wobbly part of this already questionable flying machine. It kills the mystique when you are constantly reminded that this gigantic steel contraption is airborne, defying an obscene amount of natural laws. Flaps are shimmying, pieces are shaking – and I’m talking about my reaction to what’s going on outside with the wing.

            Speaking of shimmying flaps, I’ve never understood the appeal of the “Mile High Club.” Don’t get me wrong, I’m no prude. I’m pretty much ready for sex at the drop of a hat (literally, making attending graduations very exciting). But on a plane? I think that I’ll pass. Maybe if we were crashing and I wanted to go out on top – that seemed crass – I mean I want to go out with a bang – wait, that’s even worse. Let’s just say before the plane crashes, I might want to do it. How enjoyable would that be though? People consumed with grief, sobbing and reflecting on a wasted life that has brought them to this dire moment. When I put it that way, it sounds like my wife’s typical response to sex anyway. Alright then, let’s get the old tray into its upright and locked position, if you know what I mean. That’s an innuendo. For sex. The tray is a metaphor for a boner. If you know what I mean.

 

Let's Get Coffee                                         by Christin M. Rice

photograph by Tad Wagner of tadwagner.com



The Great Name Swap

 

 
In the English-speaking world we mark epochs in swaps. We swapped scrolls for books; horses for automobiles; tape for digital, etc. But such swaps aren’t always technology driven. We swapped monarchy for democracy; book-burning for bra-burning; free water for expensive water (still trying to figure that one out).
           
Consider the cultural exchange in baby-naming:
The name Dartanion – have you met any Dartanions lately? I actually did know a Dartanion in third grade. We called him “Dart” which was a wonderful name for rhyming. But the fact that I did know one only proves my point – the Dartanions, Mildreds and Adolfs of the world are mostly dead. When we run across one of these names we quietly cringe and then offer a brief but sincere nod of condolence… or we laugh and point and rhyme. Those names mark a different era and we do our best to hinder them from sneaking back into normalcy.
 
Look, we all know a Dick. He goes to your church or he plays golf with your father or he’s your dentist. His birth certificate reads “Richard” but, inexplicably, he calls himself Dick. He’s a nice guy with pepper-grey hair and a mild case of (ironically) erectile dysfunction. The Dick you know isn’t under the age of fifty. These guys are carrying that name into oblivion; it will die with that generation and nobody will mourn.
 
The baby boys born in the last ten years (who would have been named Dick except for chronological enlightenment) are now called Jacob. Jacob is the new Dick. We swapped it. Jacob’s a nice name phonetically but it’ll fall out of favor in a good forty years because of what it means. Jacob means liar. Yeah that’s right, the most popular baby boy’s name in 2007-America was actually “deceiver.” If that isn’t a sign of the times, I don’t know what is.
 
Now, it will take a while before Jacob gets swapped out for something else because it will take a while for this etymological fact to get disseminated. And it doesn’t help that if you buy a bookmark or trinket with that name on it, the given definition is “crafty.” This, of course, is a lie perpetuated by people named Jacob who are liars. Which, of course, is a Dickish thing to do.
 
Yes, I am well aware that the name Jacob is “biblical” which still seems to be a selling point in some circles. However, I’m pretty sure that these people aren’t actually reading the Bible before they christen their newborns. Those who do read will remember that the original Jacob got his name swapped for the name “Israel.” God’s no dummy, but apparently most Americans are. So be patient, it will take some time for that one to get swapped out.
 
Then there are names that are difficult to account for, like Mindy. What happened to all of the Mindys? The youngest Mindy on the planet is thirty five. Was this name denounced in Vatican II? Did C. Everett Coop deem it hazardous? What ever happened, that name got swapped out in the 1970’s. And, bizarre but true, the name “Madison” replaced it.
 
Last year, Madison rose to fifth on America’s most popular name list. The name didn’t even exist before 1984! Need proof? Put the movie Splash on your Netflix queue. In that movie, Daryl Hannah plays a landed mermaid opposite Tom Hanks. New to civilization, Hanks asks her to choose a name for herself. They happen to be walking past Madison Avenue so she chooses “Madison.” Hanks is baffled by the choice: “Madison isn’t a name!” he declares. It only took a couple decades for a complete swap out. Sorry Mindy, you’ll die with the generation that associates that name with Mork.
 
I’ve spent some time in an English-speaking African country. It seems that entire continents can swap names. African Americans seem to have made a major trade in the 1970s. That was when we first started seeing names like Kisha, Monisha and Shaquana (for girls) and Jamar, Kwame and Salim (for boys). As it turns out, Black America got the better end of this deal. Here are some of the English names I encountered in Southern Africa: Jealous, Last, Mistake, Coke, and my favorite, “Oilpit.” The first three of these are extremely common for both girls and boys. The last two are simply too delightful not to mention. I do believe that history will judge this swap to be on par with the dude who sold Manhattan for some beads.
 
Finally, I would be remiss not to mention that name swapping has consequences in the celebrity world. Consider these swaps: Thomas Cruise Mapother IV became Tom Cruise. Ralph Lipshitz became Ralph Lauren. Terry Bollea became Hulk Hogan. Arnold Dorsey became Englebert Humperdinck.
 
Isn’t it easier to believe that Thomas Cruise Mapother IV could become the chief evangelist of a religious cult? I don’t know about you, but I’d wear the name Lipshitz on my underwear with pride! Wouldn’t it be all the more embarrassing to get your ass whooped by a guy named Terry? As for Arnold Dorsey, the swap to Englebert Humperdinck is a no-brainer. Of course the addition of “Cougar Mellencamp” would have made it the best name in history. Unfortunately, few people have enough names to swap for that kind of clout.

 

 

Cubicle Bound

        by Stephen Ausburne

(to the tune of Simon and Garfunkel's, "Homeward Bound")

 

I’m starin’ at the vending machine
Egg salad sandwich or a Lean Cuisine…mmm mmm
Latte better be full caff
No time to chat, no time to laugh
Eat quick, got to meet with staff
Amuse them with a color graph

Cubicle bound
I wish I was
Cubicle bound
Cube, where my stapler’s stapling
Cube, where I sit and daydream
Cube, where my cloth wall’s waiting
Drab and beige for me

Everyday’s an endless stream
Of leading tours and building teams…mmm mmm
Each meeting seems the same to me
Employees and their silly needs
Each fluorescent light I see
Reminds me that I long to be

Cubicle bound
I wish I was
Cubicle bound
Cube, where there’s no escaping
Cube, my ego’s deflating
Cube, where my cloth wall’s waiting
Drab and beige for me

Phone’s there for me without fail
The red light says I’ve got voice mail…mmm mmm
I’ll organize my paper clips
Buy pens with ergonomic grips
The post-it notes are mine to keep
I think my ass just fell asleep

Cubicle bound
I wish I was
Cubicle bound
Cube, where my life is wasting
Cube, all my hopes erasing
Cube, where my cloth wall’s waiting
Drab and beige for me
Drab and beige for me
Drab and beige for me

 

The Missing Sock:

A fable for creative survival in corporate America 
 

by Christin M. Rice

      Imagine large font.  And here is where we introduce a clever, but really simple fable.  Were this book-length, I would then use this fable to talk down to you for the next 80 pages.  The sole purpose of this fable is to have something to hang all of my pithy one-liners (which you are meant to take to heart and I will repeat, using PowerPoint, when you bring me in for a 20,000 dollar speaking engagement at your conference.  I will be sure to have very white teeth and many anecdotes for this).  The fable is this: You have a favorite pair of socks.  There’s just something about them: the look, the feel, the story behind how they came to be in your possession.  But there’s something inevitable about favorite socks—one half of the pair always gets lost.  You’re left rummaging through the sock drawer, hoping against hope that it is lost beneath the socks you don’t like quite as much.  But your single, solitary sock is the perfect example of what life is like as a creative person in corporate America.  And now that we are nearing the end of the first paragraph, it’s time for pithy statement number one: 

You don’t belong here 

      You belong with your other half, your true self, your purpose for life.  In short, your socks were meant to be paired.  Perhaps you know where the other sock is, perhaps it is safely tucked in a dark drawer corner and you are in the hamper.  You know it like the back of your hand (I forgot to mention that the fable would be punctuated with annoying clichés); you are just separated from it.  Or perhaps the other sock has gone missing for so long its whereabouts seem lost forever.   There’s a vague thread (many corny metaphors are also a prerequisite) of an idea that you were meant for more, you meant to have had your big break by now, and not be stuck in your 9 to 5 cycle of filing, checking documents, staring at the computer screen.  Or you are an artist, but your day job is in corporate marketing, which means you get to use your love .002% of the time, and have meetings and office frustration the rest of the time.  You might have gotten to the place of believing that maybe there isn’t another sock: certain days have you feeling that life really is uni-socked, and the occasional good feeling from your job is the best there is to be had.  But I urge you: 

You must find your other sock 

      It’s a proven fact (okay, I vehemently believe it’s true) that you have another sock to you, and that other sock completes you.  It could be art, music, writing, crocheting, cooking, or any other creative expression that requires engagement of the soul.  When you are paired, going through life with your full potential intact, that’s when you are happiest, no?  The first step is to identify what the missing sock is for you.  Now, if you have the luxury to quit corporate life while you quest for this understanding, bully for you.  The rest of us hate you a little and secretly suspect you have less character than us who feel stuck in the rat race.  The rest of us must use our mornings, evenings, and/or weekends and days off to figure this out.  Now, here’s the thing about the corporate world: there’s a distinct seductive quality to health insurance, that whole “paycheck thing,” and a title to toss around whenever introductions are required at parties.  So, it’s really, really easy to slowly die there, creatively and/or spiritually speaking.  And time off feels so necessary for sleep, a social life, Netflix.  The whole weekend can go by like that, and suddenly you’re surrounded again by beige cube walls wishing you knew what you really wanted.  There are books with smaller font and more intellectual positions that can help you find this out for yourself.  Or, my personal favorite, take advantage of the corporate tests that your company pays for to find something out about you in order to figure out how to get more out of you.   But use them to figure out the exact ways you don’t belong there. After you determine just what color your missing sock is,  

You must fold your socks together 

      Whether you roll them up, tie them to each other, or fold the ankle of one over the other, you must find a way to ensure your socks stay linked.  The socks need to become integrated.  This means you must first find a way to bring more of the other sock with you to work.  This will feel awkward at first.  Others, in their contented one-sock natures will find your behavior suspect.  The corporate life does not favor two-sockedness: it draws too much attention to the beige.

      Once you have found your other sock and have brought it to work with you consistently, almost inevitably you figure out that: 

You still don’t belong here 

      And that’s when you have to figure out how to either survive inside it or get the hell out.  Ultimately, your two-socked self runs counter cultural to corporate America, and honestly, I’m not sure you’re doing any good for the world there if you can’t exist as a fully realized pair.  It’s not where you belong, and therefore you are not doing the things your life is calling you to do that must be done.  Maybe you can’t leave, or at least not yet: that happens.  Now the task is to learn how to not lose your other sock at work.  You can do this many ways, and it is your singular project to figure out how to do it for yourself (and by all means, avail yourself of spreadsheets and whatever else you can take advantage of in your workplace).  Hell, if you must, write a fable and market is as corporate self-help.  Use large font and one-sentence pithy phrases.

 

 Second Hand Underpants

By Ivan Goddard

 

You know you’re not in high finance

Considering second-hand underpants.

You check your mind how’d it get so bad?

What happened to those other underpants you had?

                            From “Inner City Pressure” by the Flight of the Conchords

 

My wife and I recently purchased a compact, lightweight, versatile baby backpack from the States.  It came with an instructional DVD, so I popped it in our player.  Unfortunately, we have a region 2 player and the disc is region 1.  This meant that I only got the audio, which isn’t very helpful.  But I didn’t discover the video problem until I heard the first line of the disc.  It was of a man saying, “My wife and I were interested in attachment parenting…” 

I did not realize we were purchasing a lifestyle.  If this was the first thing mentioned on the instructional DVD, they must be serious about it.  But in all honesty, I was interested in a convenient way to get from point A to point B with my daughter in tow.  A baby backpack seems like a completely reasonable product for a normal, non-pony-tailed father to own.  If we want to go for a short walk in the hills or on the beach, a stroller won’t do and Baby Bjorns are poorly designed for 33 year olds who don’t work out.  So this baby backpack seemed perfect.  But attachment parenting?  Can I carry around my daughter without endorsing an ideology?

Not that I’m opposed to ideological parenting, per se.  But I would rather have an ideology that allowed me to do housework without another human on my back.  It turns out, though, that almost every parenting choice requires some sort of stance, and it’s always touchy ground to bring up certain choices you make.  Natural childbirth?  Home or hospital?  Did you have an amnio?  Breast or bottle?  What kind of diapers?  Do you let your kids cry?  Do they sleep in your bed?  Do you make your own baby food?  Do you let your kids watch Baby Einstein?  And on and on. 

Asking these sorts of questions of someone is a bad idea.  First of all, it’s kind of rude.  Secondly, it’s a good way to create tension in the room.  Many people have strong opinions about these sorts of things and some are not afraid to show it.  But the fact is, they’re all questions parents have to answer.  My wife and I have had to answer several of them with more to come in the future.  And we definitely follow a particular ideology, but it isn’t one that I see as often in parenting.  We follow the ideology of frugality. 

Whatever is cheapest is likely the route we’ll take.  This is where the epigram fits in.  My wife in her frugal ways has become an avid reader of a used diaper website (obviously these are cloth diapers) and has managed to buy all the diapers our daughter will need—“from birth to potty”—for around $100.  Think about that.  I mean, I feel very strongly about conservation—we buy local groceries, we compost and recycle, use biodegradable soaps, ride bicycles, etc.—but if Al Gore can’t convince you to use cloth diapers, perhaps Benjamin Franklin can (he’s on the $100 bill and he also said “a penny saved is a penny earned”).  Being extremely conservative here, if a child were to go through 5 diapers per day at 10 cents a diaper and was potty trained on his 3rd birthday, it would cost the parents around $550.  If you consider that I can use these second hand diapers on our second child as well, we’re saving $1000. And again, that's conservative. Also, I can say to my children, when the world is destroyed and we’re trekking for our lives like the father and son in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, “It’s not my fault that the world is this way.  It’s the fault of all those people who didn’t want to save $1000 on diapers.” (One other point that probably doesn't apply to most people is that the county where we live in the UK has reimbursed us half of the cost of my daughter's diapers because it saves them money in the long run not having to lug around soiled nappies to dump them in expensive real estate. So it's even cheaper for us than I suggested.)

        But diapers are only one aspect of our frugality. We have also figured out how to spend $0 on clothes for our child. I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks the cost of children's clothing is ludicrous. I read recently that the average baby in the UK receives £8000 worth of brand new goods in his or her first year! This is almost impossible to believe. That's roughly $16000. What could you possibly spend that money on?
       Don't answer that question. I can take a guess. Besides diapers, there's a stroller, a car seat, clothes, toys, a crib, blankets, feeding appurtenances, and what else? Actually, how does that add up to $16000? We have acquired all of the above and more and it cost us $230. No joke. And that's because we bought a really nice stroller... used. Everything, in fact, is used or gifted (the baby backpack was a gift).  We've spent almost as much on thank you cards as we have on usable items.
     Some of the clothes have been used by 3 other babies before ours. And the reasons I don't feel bad about it is because a) my daughter can't tell and b) nobody else can either. Anyway, I generally buy my clothes used as well. But I rarely give my new clothes away to thrift stores because I wear them out. As I write this I'm wearing a shirt I bought at the Gap the year the Chicago Bulls won their first NBA title, Nirvana was the next big thing in music, and George W. Bush was dreaming of becoming the next commissioner of Major League Baseball (no joke, but I may have to retire the shirt because of a hole in the elbow). Babies, on the other hand, don't wear anything out. My daughter has already outgrown most things that she was wearing when John Edwards dropped out of the Democratic primaries. And it's not as if she moves around enough to wear anything out anyway. It sounds expensive but we have a closet full of clothes that people were more than happy to dump on us and we’ll do the same to some other couple.

            So if you have diapered your baby in Pampers® and you meet an extremely cute baby with a heavily padded midsection in a baby backpack, don’t automatically label the parents as arugula eating bobos who think they’re better than you. Rather, they are income-challenged cheapskates who are better than you, you Earth killer.

 

Since the Baby Arrived

by Dagmar Schröter

 

There are some mothers who just can’t get enough baby time. You’ve met her. She has five boys, all a year apart, all look like clones of their father, each plays four sports and French horn. She smiles at her newest addition while she inflicts upon the world her polite Aryan super species. Her birth labours range from three to five hours and she didn’t feel pain, she felt 'pressure.' She has a book about it that she wants to loan you. Plain and simple, she is a freak of nature. Frankenstein’s mother. For every one of her there are ten thousand of us who qualify for Super Nanny.

Since the baby arrived, I haven’t had much time to reflect. The past six months have been spent in survival mode. I did, however, take a moment to pause last week. I had a brief moment of clarity when it finally hit me. My friends without children have no clue. Not even an upside down map in hieroglyph.

This is the kind of thing that’d make mine eyes rolleth when I was unhappily single and without child. I’d hear my friends bitch and moan about colic and sleep and I’d secretly accuse them of whining. Not only is parenthood universal, but others seems to suffer through it every day without a peep. More importantly, they’d come whining to me when I wasn’t even dating, much less experiencing the dark joys of motherhood. So now I’ve become that whiner. Please believe me when I say that I really don’t give a sodding damn what my childless friends think of me. They have no fucking clue.

If you don’t have children and you need bread, you go to the market and get bread. You get in your car, drive, get out, walk into the store, get the bread, pay and walk back to your car. I pine for the days when I could simply get bread. Those days are over. Just getting to the car is like forging the Rio Grand. It’s a raging river of diapers, suckers, car seats, bjorns, blankets, bra pads, buggies and twenty other things vital to our survival out in the real world.

Truth be told, having a baby in the house is a life sucking, spirit breaking, ego stifling boot camp ninety five percent of the time. The other five percent involves smiling goo gahs and sleep. The latter of these is a white elephant, because erratic sleep is almost worse than no sleep.

Boot camp. This is a time honoured military initiation where soldiers are deprived sleep, made to endure vast amounts of burning fortitude and mind bending nonsense. One drill sergeant will stand atop fifteen flights of stairs and scream orders to descend. Another will stand below the same fifteen flights and scream orders to ascend. Drill sergeant number one will then curse over your utter stupidity for refusing to follow his original order to descend. Drill sergeant number two will do the same from the other end. This continues for hours until your mind is wiped clean of any desire for logic.

Much like drill sergeants, babies work tirelessly to find that vulnerable place inside your mind where logic is suspended. You are being conditioned to obey without reservation or hesitation. Once conditioned, you become the perfect foot soldier. You are now a mindless marcher armed with nothing but goo goo face and engorged sacks of milk.

There are a few basics to human dignity that babyless folks take for granted. Yesterday I held my water for three hours because the baby won't stay asleep unless she's being held. This is not that toilet time is the sanctuary it once was anyway. Pooping is a chore involving petrified teak bark interrupted by the occasional spraying of liquid fire. All this while drill sergeant number one coos lovingly from her bouncy chair stationed on the bathroom floor. As I type, the little gremlin sits at my feet humming. That constant humming! It’s like an ant crawling on my eardrum. I’ve become a poorly medicated asylum patient. My hair hasn’t been brushed in days. What’s the point? I can’t leave because the portly id must be fed every two hours and she won’t take the goddamned formula!

My friend rings and asks me out to the movies. I decline with all the magnanimity I can muster and hear the confused pity on the other end of the line. It can’t be all that bad, can it? She thinks. I haven’t the heart to tell her that she’s a clueless, self centred sack of… okay, take a breath. That’s just the lack of sleep talking. The ant on my eardrum made me think that. Have to focus!! I calmly apologize and tell her that I won’t be meeting her at the pub after the movie either.

Even if I could get this train wreck of a subhuman to take a bottle, would I even want to go to the pub? What would I have to say to those well rested tossers?

I used to be smart. I once read poetry; I wrote book reviews; I discussed Hannah Arendt. Now my vocabulary has been reduced to 'agoo' and 'babababa.' When I do get a spare moment, I write essays about my poop for webzines. This essay has employed the word “goo” thrice and “agoo” once for variety. Lovely.

 

 

She's Got A Way

by Gordon Gartrell

 

The click clacking of typing and occasional sales calls construct the white noise of my beige, corporate environment.  All is as it should be, until she happens.  She sits a few cubicles away from me.  I cannot work when she speaks.  I am all consumed by her voice.  That voice.  That insidiously grating voice.  Her voice carries like tear gas in a bank vault making its way to my ears and eventually seeping into my brain rendering me mentally useless due to her inane musings.  Oh what I wouldn’t do for a sock and some packing tape.   

 

How do her cube mates not reach over and destroy her?   

 

I am not a hateful person, in fact I am quite the opposite, but this woman possesses a supernatural banality that only a stuffed animal could tolerate.  She’s dull and not at all bright, yet she makes up for those shortcomings by being loud and delivering vacuous stares during social situations. 

 

Why, oh why does she feel compelled to narrate every minute detail of her inconsequential work routine?  No one needs to know exactly what the next software prompt might be.  No one is on the edge of their seat waiting for her response. 

  • Huh, it’s asking me if I want to save the changes to Document1.  Hmmmm.  Yes, no, or cancel?  Well let’s see…I would like to pull this up later.  Well guys, I think I will save it.  Gonna click ‘yes’ Oh my!  Another box opened up.  Hmmmm, what to save it as?
 I wish I could say that that monologue was cut short because an anvil fell from the ceiling putting an end to my misery, but the reality is, I couldn’t even relive the moment in print any longer without wanting to set my myself on fire. 
 

One day, I was actually required to engage in a conversation with this woman because of a business related matter.  I dreaded the moment and tried to avoid it like an elective surgical procedure that you know you should have, but are also deathly afraid of having because of side effects like nausea, hemorrhaging, or the spontaneous desire to gouge out one’s own eyes.  I was able to muster up the strength to go and explain some data points to this woman knowing full well it was going to be a painful experience.  It would have been more productive to endeavor to teach sign language to an oscillating fan.  After my report was delivered I had the pleasure of enjoying several awkward moments of silence as this woman gave me the wide eyed gape one might expect from an extra in the film Awakenings.  Just when I thought that perhaps God had, out of frustration, shut her down like C-3PO, she began to respond.  Good lord in heaven.  It was as an unintelligible as instructions handed down from Charlie Brown’s teacher.  I retreated to my desk having become stupider just for being near this person. 

 

The Infinite Monkey Theorem suggests that if you take a monkey and put it in front of a typewriter and let it bang on the keys for an infinite amount of time, it will eventually produce something akin to the entire works of Shakespeare.  I have developed the 4 Minute Monkey Theorem.  Its main premise is that if you give monkey four minutes with a typewriter and whether it spends the full time allotted banging on the keys or just throwing feces at the paper, it will produce something more intellectually stimulating than anything this woman has ever uttered. 

 

I feel better just writing this.  Now I can go back to work.


 


 

Vanilla

by Erin Dunigan

 

I have to admit—I have never understood. Why vanilla? Isn’t vanilla what’s left when you take away the flavor? Isn’t it what you’ve got once you’ve already picked out all the cookie dough chunks? Vanilla’s what you’re stuck with, not what you choose.  

 

Not only have I not understood vanilla, but I have also failed to see why anyone, when given the choice, requests vanilla. Did you not see that there were other options? Did you not realize—you could have chocolate, oreo, mocha, heath bar…maybe you didn’t know there were flavors available?  

 

And if I admit it, I assume a lot about these people.  

 

They must be boring, right? They clearly are uninterested in experiencing variety in life. Most likely they are homebodies, excited enough to just be out of the house and so have no need to gain additional enjoyment from what they eat. Who turns down variety in favor of plainness?  

 

Oh, maybe they’re those kind of people, the ones with long straggly hair who wear Birkenstocks. For them maybe vanilla is a political statement—I don’t need your consumer culture with all its choice, I’ll show you and I’ll order vanilla.  

 

Are they afraid of flavor? Is it somehow easier to pick vanilla because then at least you know what you are getting? There’s no risk involved with vanilla, no danger of trying something new and not liking it. Perhaps they are just people in need of therapy to work through some of these issues. 

 

So, you might be surprised to know that I recently purchased a pint of vanilla ice cream. Lest you jump to conclusions, let me tell you that this was a reasonable choice—I planned on making some desserts and needed an unthreatening ice cream accompaniment. Enter, vanilla. 

 

As happens with conversion, change snuck up on me.  I had just finished dinner. I wanted something sweet. I didn’t have much on hand. But then I remembered the vanilla ice cream, sitting unthreateningly in the freezer.

 

I guess I could have some of that vanilla ice cream.

 

But I don’t have anything to go with it, do I?

 

Nope.

 

Too bad, I was sort of hoping for some dessert.

 

You know, you could have just the ice cream.

 

Plain? Are you serious? Vanilla is an accompaniment, not a dessert of its own. Silly self.  

 

It was too late. The window of possibility opened just wide enough for a few scoops of vanilla to sneak through and slip down the cracks. Everyone knows that there’s always room for ice cream.

 

The crazy thing is—it was good. Not just acceptable as my only option. Flat out good. On its own good. No need for any accompaniment good.  

 
I’m just about done with that pint.  One night I did add some sliced peaches.  They were all right. But they were no plain vanilla.

 

 

On Friendship

by Bradley Summerfield

 

 

"What's friendship, when all's done,

but the giving and taking of wounds?"

                                                                                  ~Frederick Buechner

 

            I first read Godric, Frederick Buechner's amazingly poignant and insightful novel retelling the life of the medieval English saint of the same name, as a 21 year old college student. I was traveling through Great Britain trying to absorb the depth and wisdom of the English Christian tradition on a six week tour. I was, of course, a remarkably ignorant person, most of all about my own limitations and faults. I think that I instinctively grasped that Buechner was right about the importance of pain in the development of a person, but I never really expected that I would have to go through any myself, and I really wasn't all that interested in sharing with anyone else's.

            I'm thirty-five now. There is some water under the bridge. I've begun to realize in the last year or two that I have finally begun to become a man instead of a child, which is timely, since I now have a child of my own to look after. And the main mover in my gradual and always resisted path to growth has been my willingness to acknowledge my own mistakes and insecurities, and my willingness to take on the sorrows and disappointments of my family and friends.

            It turns out life is really quite difficult. We are all (if we are honest) lonely, worried, fearful people with dark corners, compulsions, and insecurities which we try to hide away. Our marriages are difficult, we are anxious about money, we loathe certain things about our bodies, we feel incapable of being good parents, we wonder about our health, and we know, deep down, that we are destined to eventually suffer and die. It isn't pretty.

            But the beauty of life, the one thing that makes it worth living, is that we don't have to do it alone. And I think that the secret to becoming mature lies in learning to accept that life is difficult, even to embrace that fact, so that we can learn to give away our wounds to our friends even while they do the same to us. It involves learning that there most likely isn't a perfect job, or a perfect marriage partner, or a perfect place to move to where the problems will vanish. It is accepting that the problem is inherent to life itself, and no amount of money, or sex, or power will make it any easier.

            Maybe this isn't earth shattering, but it has been a hard lesson for me to learn. It is one of those paradoxes that seem to emerge in life. Once we have accepted that life sucks, we begin to be in the position to have it not suck anymore. The giving and receiving of wounds is ultimately, at the bottom, the most powerfully satisfying thing going. I suppose that it is what is called love. What a world it would be if we only had more of it. There wouldn't be any fewer tears, but at least they wouldn't be cried alone.

 

C.C. O'Lorin has responded to the above article:

Like Dr. Summerfield, I read Godric before fatherhood, debt, unemployment and depression. I was as happy as a dumbass and read it in two days. I revisited this great book when I lived in England, not 5 miles from Godric’s hermitage. I was older but my time near Fincole Priory was one of my most blissful. I remember thinking that St. Godric was the type of guy who indulged in his grief. He reveled in his darkness in a way that smacked of self-centeredness. Get over yourself! Your pain is a result of your love affair with pain!

The waves have tossed me a few times since then. Friends with troubled marriages. Friends with cancer. A few rough patches of my own have made this last year interesting. Depression is funny thing. It introduces you to yourself in a way that nothing else can. It can change the way you look in the mirror. But the strangest thing about depression is that you start seeing the most important people in your life through that same reflection. My previously held “snap out of it” view of self-indulgent pain hasn’t really helped me.


Dr. Summerfield claims that “The giving and receiving of wounds is ultimately, at the bottom, the most powerfully satisfying thing going.” While this has a ring of authenticity, it is a hard saying to internalize. My depression lives in a place where nobody goes but me. Allowing another into that place seems like dangerous business. This is the same part of me that wants to reread Godric again for purposes of self-indulgence. Bringing Buechner into my darkness seems much less risky.

 

 

 

 

A Snake in the Garden

by James Batterham